Legal Opinion
Rice v. Ed Hockaday & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1924No. 14441PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This was an action by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants, to recover damages for the sale of personal property of the plaintiff under an alleged void judgment.
It appears that on the 7th day of November, 1919, defendants Ed Hockaday & Company and W. A. Mitchell, acting for them, instituted an action against! the plaintiff before the defendant H. E. Hopkins, justice of the peace in and for Kingfisher county, to recover the sum of $145.49, balance due on an account, and at the same time filed in said cause an attachment affidavit, in which it was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Welch v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Hockaday v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Weller v. Western State Bank of WaukomisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Friedman v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- First National Bank of Hennessey v. HesserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Empire Supply Co. v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927