Steneman v. Breyfogle
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWicichem, J.
The defendant first appeals from that part of the order which provides “that the answer of the jury to question number one of the special verdict be changed by the court from ‘No’ to ‘Yes;’ that the answer to question number three be supplied and that said question be answered ‘Yes.’ ” This portion of the order is not ap-pealable. Larson v. Hanson, 207 Wis. 485, 242 N. W. 184, and cases there cited.- Defendant also appeals from that part of the order which grants the defendant the option, to be exercised within ten days, to let judgment be taken against him for $1,800 and costs. This portion…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Larson v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Treat v. HilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Borowicz v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Victor Sewing Machine Co. v. HellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- McCauley v. International Trading Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Hawkins v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Fox v. KaminskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Krause v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.