Legal Opinion

United States v. McKeeve

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 8, 1997No. 96-2273PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant David S. McKeeve assembles a litany of alleged errors in protest of his conviction and sentence. His flagship claim requires us to investigate the circumstances under which the Confrontation Clause allows a prosecution witness to testify by foreign deposition over the defendant’s objection. After carefully considering this issue (a matter of first impression in. this circuit) and assaying the appellant’s other points, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Mindful of the appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we limn the facts in the light’ most…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States v. JasinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. United States v. Abu AliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  3. Faigin v. Kelly & CarucciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. PiperCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Kelley v. Airborne Freight Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API