Legal Opinion

King v. Gildersleeve

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1889No. 11882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. ¿ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

— The deceased, Corwin, and the defendant Baldwin, being in litigation involving the title to a certain tract of land, the former entered into a written contract with the appellant’s intestate, by which he agreed that, in consideration of his services, to be rendered as an attorney for said Corwin, in said litigation, he would convey to Lawrence “a lot of land out of the premises which may be recovered by him, fronting thirty feet on Hayes Street, by a uniform depth southerly of 137 ½ feet, which is to be of equal quality and value, as the re*507maindor of said premises, free of encumbrances…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vassault v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Shaban v. ShabanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Thurber v. MevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People Ex Rel. Gow v. Mitchell Brothers' Santa Ana TheaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API