Legal Opinion

Woodtek, Inc. v. Musulin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff, an Oregon corporation, brought this suit seeking rescission of a contract to purchase a lumber mill business from defendants Matt and Mike Musulin, who are father and son. Plaintiff alleged that defendants had materially misrepresented the financial condition of the business. From a decree dismissing the suit, plaintiff appeals. (1)

In April, 1969, defendant Matt Mnsnlin began construction of a stud mill in Prineville, Oregon, under the name of Mnsnlin Studs, Inc. The name was changed in July, 1969, to Musulin Forest Products, Inc., and is hereinafter referred to as Musulin, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Brown Et Ux v. Hassenstab Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Musulin v. Woodtek, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Insurance Company of North America v. BrehmOregon Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hampton v. SabinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Miller v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API