Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taylor v. Birks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1958No. 37425Published

1DissentWilliams, Justice

The instructions complained of in this case are Nos. 13 and 16. Instruction No. 13 is set out in full in the majority opinion. Instruction No. 16, which is not set out, is as follows:

“You are further instructed that if you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant, C. R. Taylor, was guilty of any acts of negligence alleged in plaintiff’s petition and that the defendant Happel, was also guilty of negligence which contributed to or commingled with the negligence of C. R. Taylor, and further find that plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence, then your verdict…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Georgia v. BrailsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1794
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Dickinson v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API