Legal Opinion
State v. Tejeda
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 12, 1992No. 89-CR-0032; CA A63948Published
1Per curiam
Defendant’s probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. TejedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992