Legal Opinion

State v. Tejeda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. 89-CR-0032; CA A63948Published

1Per curiam

Defendant’s probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TejedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992