Legal Opinion

State v. Tejeda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. 89-CR-0786; CA A63949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. ORS 475.992(4). He makes three assignments of error. We affirm the conviction and remand for resentencing.

A deputy sheriff searched defendant’s home, pursuant to a search warrant, and seized slightly more than one ounce of cocaine and $2,350. Defendant’s first assignment is:

“The trial court erred in admitting testimony and allowing argument to the effect that defendant has possessed cocaine in the past, that he had sold cocaine, that the amount of cocaine found in defendant’s residence was a larger amount than that used for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. SullensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. TejedaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API