Legal Opinion

Mott v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

It is urged by defendants, Armen and O’Neill, and the intervener that the circuit court erred in holding that shareholders, who gave notice of with drawal prior to the time when the corporation commissioner took charge of the association, did not thereby become creditors of the association or obtain any preference right over shareholders who gave no notice of withdrawal; and, especially, in holding that the intervener, whose notice of withdrawal was given more than sixty days prior to the date when the corporation commissioner took charge, did not become a creditor of the association at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Strohen v. Franklin Saving Fund & Loan Ass'n ex rel. McKinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  3. Brown v. Victor Building Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Engelhardt v. Fifth Ward Permanent Dime Saving & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Heinbokel v. National Savings, Loan & Bldg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Logan County Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rummens v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DonahueWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fuzy v. Department of Financial InstitutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API