State v. Mourlas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, C. J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. She contends that the trial court erred by denying her pretrial motion to suppress statements that she made during field sobriety tests and by sentencing her to probation under ORS 813.020. We affirm.
Officer Rhodes responded to a report that someone in a white car was breaking windows at a residence. When he arrived, he found defendant standing beside a white car. He asked her what was going on, and she responded that her husband was in the house with another woman. While talking with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Winroth v. Driver & Motor Vehicle ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996