Herrington v. Wells Fargo Bank (In Re Herrington)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.
Presently before me are the motions of defendants Delta Funding Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, N.A. to compel arbitration as to two counts of the plaintiffs amended complaint, 1 Count II, styled “HOEPA Recoupment,” and Count III, styled “UDAP.”
“A motion to compel arbitration calls for a two-step inquiry into (1) whether a valid agreement to arbitrate exists and (2) whether the particular dispute falls within the scope of that agreement.” Trippe Mfg. Co. v. Niles Audio Corp., 401 F.3d 529, 532 (3d Cir.2005). As will be discussed below, the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Consolidated Fgh Liquidating TrustUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009
- In Re Image Master, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009