Legal Opinion
San Francisco Apartment Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2018No. 15-17381PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge
We must determine whether a San Francisco city ordinance limiting the rights of landlords to commence and conduct buyout negotiations is consistent with the federal and state constitutions. We do not, as we must not, evaluate the policy merits of the ordinance. Appellants—an individual property owner and several organizations that represent landlords’ interests in San Francisco—present us with assertions but no authority which suggests the ordinance runs afoul of either constitution! We therefore affirm the district court’s decision to grant the City and County of San…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dean Hotop v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- X Corp. v. BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Chong Yim v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Pac. Coast Horseshoeing Sch., Inc. v. GrafiloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Bozek v. Arizona Labor Force IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.