Legal Opinion

United States v. Jannuzzio

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 10, 1960No. Crim. A. 1127PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for a judgment of acquittal, or in the alternative, for a new trial. 1 2 Defendants, Columbus Jannuzzio and Dominick Merlonghi, were tried and convicted by a jury on four counts of willfully attempting to defeat and evade federal income taxes and Federal Insurance Contribution Act (F.I.C.A.) taxes withheld from the wages of employees of Printz Motor Sales Company in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 2707(c) of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code as made applicable by 26 U.S.C. §§ 1627 and 1430. 8

The prosecution period embraces the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Arthur King Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. David v. Yarborough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philip A. Foley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. Victor S. VoorhiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Edwin E. DackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Charles L. O. Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. United States v. ShermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API