Legal Opinion

Merchants' National Bank v. Pendleton

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, Broome county. Two actions, respectively, brought by the Merchants’ National Bank of Binghamton, N. Y., and John Seacord, against Charles E. Pendleton and others, and a third action brought by Annie O’Hearn against Elizabeth Pearsall and others, wherein it was sought to hold defendants liable as partners in the Home Savings Bank. Defendants appeal from a judgment overruling their demurrers to the complaints.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This was an appeal from an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to the plaintiffs’ complaint. The ground of the demurrer was that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaints in these actions in substance alleged that on September 15, 1873, there was a bank instituted at South Waverly, Pa., which was conducted under the name of the “Home Savings Bank;” that it was organized by the election of a president, cashier, and board of directors; that the president was dead; that there was no treasurer; that the bank continued to ■do business…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Planters' & Miners' Bank v. PadgettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. First National Bank v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Central City Savings Bank v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  4. Merchants & Manufacturers' Bank v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Fuller v. . RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrill v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. Williamson v. WagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Georgeson v. CaffreyNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Taylor v. DinsmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API