United States v. James R. Lowenberg, Randall E. Campbell, and Michael Palumbo, Defendants- Apellants
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
Three defendants challenge their convictions for multiple counts of use of the mails to facilitate prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a) and (b). 1 They were found guilty by the jury, and, although these defendants raise myriad issues, we find no basis for reversing that verdict and affirm their convictions.
I
Lowenberg and Campbell leased buildings in Dallas, Texas and then sublet them for use as nude modeling studios. Palum-bo was Campbell’s employee. The relationship between Lowenberg and Campbell and their relationships with the studios was contested…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Ruben Rocha, Thomas Padilla, Hector Garcia-Garcia, Johnny Robert Hinojosa, and Jose Santos GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jose Angel Diaz-CarreonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Filemon Sotelo Sanchez, Jose Angel Naegele, and Rebeca Portillo Brito, United States of America v. Ricardo Portillo BritoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Gilberto Pineda-Ortuno and Carlos Ramirez-CarranzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. David Samuel IrediaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.