Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States

PeR Curiam :

This case comes before the court on plaintiff’s exceptions to the recommended decision, filed October 9, 1974, by Trial Judge Harry E. Wood, pursuant to Rule 134 (h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since tthe court agrees with the recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth*, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed.

OPINION OE TRIAL JUDGE

Wood, Trial Judge:

In this action, again before the Trial…