Haverstick v. Banet
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
Plaintiffs (Appellants) are before this Court on petition to transfer, seeking review of an opinion by the Court of Appeals found at 349 N.E.2d 282. It is their position that the ruling precedent followed by the Court and holding that, in a will contest, only the personal representative is entitled to waive the decedent’s physician-patient privilege is erroneous. The appeal arose out of an action commenced pursuant to Ind. Code § 29-1-7-17 (1971) to contest the will of Connie Schroeer. Plaintiffs, the heirs of the decedent, are alleging that at the time of the purported execution of her will,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Masonic Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. BeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Richmond Gas Corporation v. ReevesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Lembke v. UnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Winters v. WintersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re C.P.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of CPIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Haverstick v. BanetIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Haverstick v. BanetIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- In the Unsupervised Estate of Raymond F. Handley, Gregory Staten, Sr. v. Curt Handley (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018