Legal Opinion

In re C.P.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1990No. 52S04-9012-JV-781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

The question is whether patient communications to a counselor who is supervised by a psychiatrist fall within the doctor-patient privilege. We hold that a counselor who aids the psychiatrist is covered by the privilege. By contrast, a counselor who is in fact the caregiver and acts largely independently is not an adjunct to the psychiatrist and thus is not covered by the privilege.

This dispute arose after the State of Indiana filed a delinquency petition concerning C.P., a sixteen year old girl, alleging habitual disobedience, frequently called incorrigibility. Ind.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. WilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Collins v. BairIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In re L.J.M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. William Laurie Co. v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aland v. MeadWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2014
  3. Matter of CPIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Risha D. Warren v. Board of School Trustees of the Springs Valley Community School CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Robert H. Aland v. Matthew H. Mead, Governor of the State of Wyoming Wyoming Game & Fish Department and Scott Talbott, Director of the Wyoming Game & Fish DepartmentWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API