Legal Opinion

Agricola v. HARBERT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1975No. SC 1013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

The facts out of which this proceeding arose are as follows:

On' February 8, 1961, a deed was executed by Woodlane Forest Corporation, grant- or, Hugh W. Agricola, Jr., president, conveying certain property involved herein to Hugh W. Agricola, Jr., “. . . as legal Guardian for John Disque Agricola, Elsie Claire Agricola, and Susan Camille Agricola, under agreement dated February 8, 1961, . . . ” grantee.

This deed was filed for record in the Probate Court of Etowah County on February 9, 1961.

The instrument dated February 8, 1961, in pertinent part, provided:

“THIS AGREEMENT made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. HerzfeldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Ensign Yellow Pine Co. v. HohenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Birmingham & Atlantic A. R. R. Co. v. L. &. N. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. City of Huntsville v. BrownCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Campus Crest at Tuscaloosa LLC; BVSHSSF Tuscaloosa LLC; CTC POV Associates LLC; Core Tuscaloosa 519-613 Red Drew; CREI-Tuscaloosa LLC; Jefferson Loft LLC; The Walk LeaseCo LLC; Riverfront Village SH, LLC; Woodlands of Tuscaloosa LLC; SSC Keller Apartments LLC; SSC Tuscaloosa Apartments LLC; Vesper Tuscaloosa LLC; University House Tuscaloosa LLC; and University Downs Funding Company v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API