Legal Opinion
Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 8, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
The first, third and fourth questions certified are improper in form.
We interpret the second question as propounding an inquiry whether specific performance may be granted to an assignee of such a contract as is pleaded in the complaint if he has failed to tender a bond executed by his assignor. So interpreting it, the answer must be “ no.”
The order should be affirmed, with costs; the second question certified answered no; and the other questions are not answered.
Caedozo, Ch. J., Pound, Cbane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Beien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Lee v. RavanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Fort M Development Corp. v. Inland Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- In Re Grove Rich Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Tarolli v. Syracuse Investment Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.