Legal Opinion
Tarolli v. Syracuse Investment Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, E. N., J.
The action is brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for an alleged breach of a land contract.
On or about the 9th of February, 1928, the General Bond & Apartment Company, Inc., as vendor, entered into a written contract with one William H. Boyle, as vendee, whereby the vendor contracted to sell and the vendee to purchase, for the sum of $2,250, a parcel of land designated as lot No. 284 of Clifford Manor, as shown upon a map filed in the Onondaga county clerk’s office. The contract called for a down payment of $562.50, and the further sum of $30 on the first day of each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Langel v. BetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lojo Realty Co. v. Estate of Isaac G. Johnson, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of De StuersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In Re Grove Rich Realty Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Harmon National Real Estate Corp. v. SwansonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935