Legal Opinion

State v. Swikert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Union: John W. Knowles, Judge. The defendant, Norman Swikert, was convicted of the crime of larceny, and from the judgment and sentence imposed by the Circuit Court he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

1. Defendant was charged with the crime of larceny of sheep, pleaded not guilty, and upon the trial was convicted. The court gave judgment against him thereon that he be confined in the penitentiary without limitation, and that he pay a fine of $50. He was thereupon paroled by the court from the effects of the sentence to the penitentiary, conditioned upon payment of the fine, which he immediately paid. Defendant appeals.

The cause was presented by defendant, by his brief as well as argument, upon many alleged errors oc*288curring at the trial; but, as there is no bill of éxceptions…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  3. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Wilson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API