Legal Opinion
Woodford v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided November 7, 1991No. 89-445-CIV-5-BR, 90-27-CIV-5-BRPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, District Judge.
This order memorializes the court’s reasoning for its denial of all summary judgment motions in its 30 October 1991 order, and should serve to streamline the issues and outline the respective burdens of proof each party must meet in this litigation.
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND ARGUMENT
These are suits in admiralty which arise out of the same transaction and have been consolidated. In their motion, which is the subject of this Order, plaintiffs seek summary judgment against the defendant for injuries sustained by plaintiffs Donald L. Woodford and Michael Huffman on 20 March…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Gele v. Chevron Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alprin v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Woodford v. Carolina Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992
- Alprin v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007