Legal Opinion

Alprin v. City of Tacoma

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 5, 2007No. 35264-8-IIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*168¶1 — Scott Alprin appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the city of Tacoma and Tacoma Public Utilities (collectively Tacoma), whom he sued for negligence when his sailboat mast hit power transmission cables suspended above Henderson Bay. Alprin argues that the trial court erred in ruling that (1) as a matter of law, Tacoma was not negligent in failing to warn of the hazard and (2) Alprin was the sole proximate cause of his damages. We hold that, by including the power lines in the NOAA1 charts, Tacoma fulfilled its duty to warn as a matter of law. We therefore affirm the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API