Legal Opinion

Stinner v. Stinner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 8, 1989No. 151 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

STOUT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Superior Court that affirmed a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County that refused to enforce Appellant Eleanore Stinner’s writ of execution to garnish Appellee Donald E. Stinner’s pension plan in order to recover sums due Appellant for alimony. We reverse.

The question for decision is whether the Order of February 5, 1980,1 which was entered in enforcement of the parties’ property settlement agreement of June 10, 1977, which contained a provision for the payment of alimony to the wife until death…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Cody v. RieckerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  4. Hopkinson v. HopkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Lurie v. LurieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shirley W. Stewart v. Thorpe Holding Company Profit Sharing Plan, Thomas A. Carpenter, Thorpe Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Roberts v. BaughDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  3. Bart Dalton v. Carol DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In Re the Marriage of LeBlancColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State Treasurer v. AbbottMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API