Parkison v. Boddiker
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from County Court, Summit County. The complaint of J. E. Parlrison, plaintiff, alleges that the defendant, John 0. Boddiker, made his promissory note to one Charles Merrill for the sum of $100, dated October 13, 1883, payable three days after date, with interest at two per cent, per month until paid; that said Merrill on the loth day of October, 1883, indorsed said note to the plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Appeal from County Court, Summit County. The complaint of J. E. Parlrison, plaintiff, alleges that the defendant, John 0. Boddiker, made his promissory note to one Charles Merrill for the sum of $100, dated October 13, 1883, payable three days after date, with interest at two per cent, per month until paid; that said Merrill on the loth day of October, 1883, indorsed said note to the plaintiff. The amended answer of defendant sets up the following facts as a defense: That at the request of Breeze & Breeze, as attorneys for Charles Merrill, he went to their office in Breckenridge on the 13th…
1Opinion of the Court
Rising, C.
The assignments of error based upon the ruling of the court in sustaining plaintiff’s objection to the admission of proof offered by defendant present the only questions we are at liberty to consider, except the question raised by the eighth assignment, for the reason *505that to no other ruling of the court upon which an assignment is based was an exception taken.
Upon the trial the defendant offered to prove that “ the note sued upon was procured through and by fraud, and under duress, and without consideration.” The court sustained plaintiff’s objection to the admission of the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Horn v. Volcano Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Anderson v. WalterMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Bryan v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- McWhorter v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Hunt v. WeirIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Teitig v. Boesman Bros.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
- Davis v. PeckColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Glatzel v. BinschadlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Davis v. PeckColorado Court of Appeals · 1898