Legal Opinion

United States v. Cash Joseph Bonas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 17, 2003No. 02-50631PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether the record supports the district court’s finding of manifest necessity justifying a mistrial. We conclude that it does not.

Facts

Cash Bonas is a lawyer who filed a class-action suit against three supermarket chains — Ralph’s, Von’s and Lucky’s — alleging price-fixing of eggs. The supermarkets were represented in that litigation by a cadre of name-brand Los Angeles law firms. Bonas and his client lost after a jury trial. According to the government, Bonas then began harassing defense counsel with a barrage of e-mails and voicemail messages. The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  3. Hinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. United States v. Basho Elliot, A.K.A. Bosch ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. 191.07 Acres of Land, and Milan MartinekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API