Legal Opinion

Adair v. Sorenson

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 7, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 88-2385-HPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRINGTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff is a purchaser of shares of common stock of Defendant Barry Wright Corporation (Barry Wright). Plaintiff alleges that the defendants, in May and August of 1988, disseminated materially false and misleading information to the investing public. This information, asserts the plaintiff, artificially inflated the price of Barry Wright’s common stock during the time in which plaintiff bought stock.

The case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for certification of a class consisting of purchasers of Barry Wright common stock during the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Bank of Boston Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  2. Cromer Finance Ltd. v. BergerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  4. Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  5. In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API