Legal Opinion
Cromer Finance Ltd. v. Berger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 27, 2001No. 00 CIV 2284 (DLC)PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this federal securities fraud action have moved to certify as a class certain investors in the Manhattan Investment Fund, Ltd. (the “Fund”). The Fund was an offshore investment fund operated from New York by defendant Michael Berger (“Berger”). The plaintiffs allege that the class lost hundreds of millions of dollars over the course of several years due to the scheme Berger concocted. Instead of accurately reporting the Fund’s losses, the plaintiffs allege that Berger manufactured false statements showing the Fund to be profitable. It is…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Spicer v. Pier Sixty LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In Re Telik, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.