Legal Opinion
MacLearn v. Commerce Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 27, 2012No. 2010-880PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.
The petitioner, Lachlan MacLearn, and the intervenor, Simon Hutchings (together, the appellants), appeal an order of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) denying Hutchings’ motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the respondent, Commerce Insurance Company (Commerce). We affirm.
The trial court found or the record supports the following facts. Lachlan MacLearn and his wife, Wendy MacLearn, were married in 2004, and reside together. In 2006, Mrs. MacLearn purchased a 2006 Toyota Prius, which she insured through a GEICO insurance policy.
On October 16, 2008, Mr. MacLearn…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hacker v. DickmanOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Concord Hospital v. New Hampshire Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Colony Insurance v. Dover Indoor Climbing GymSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Miller v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Sunshine Insurance Co. v. SprungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great American Dining, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- HARRELSON V. USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Meridian Security Insurance Co v. Lois Schmitt-SelkenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020