Terry Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Joseph McKeiver1 and Edward Terry2 are juvenile delinquents, having acquired that status upon findings *342by the Juvenile Court of Philadelphia that each had violated a law of the Commonwealth.3 The Superior Court affirmed the adjudications per curiam and we granted allocatur. Their consolidated appeals raise a single question: whether there is a constitutional right to a jury trial in juvenile court.
Appellants argue that the Constitution of the United States, especially as interperited by In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428 (1967) and Duncan v. Louisiana,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by64 opinions
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SorrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Finken v. RoopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Matter of D.(daniel)New York Court of Appeals · 1970
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.