Legal Opinion

Loudner v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided October 12, 1995No. Civ. 94-4294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PIERSOL, District Judge.

Before the Court is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss, Docket Number 6, which came on for hearing on February 13, 1995. The Court took the motion under advisement and requested supplemental briefing and additional factual submissions on the issue of notice. Doc.21. The supplemental briefs were timely filed.

BACKGROUND

In 1967, the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, the Devils Lake Sioux Tribe, and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Council of the As-siniboine and Sioux Tribes reached a settlement with the Indian Claims Commission in which the Tribes…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lebeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Loudner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API