Legal Opinion

Loudner v. United States

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 25, 2004No. CIV 94-4294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PIERSOL, Chief Judge.

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 253, seeking an Order dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claims challenging the constitutionality and legality of the Mississippi Sioux Tribes Judgment Fund Distribution Act of 1998 (“the 1998 Act”). Pub.L.No. 105-387, 112 Stat. 3471 (codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1300d-21 et seq.) (2001). In addition, a Motion to Intervene as Defendant, Doc. 256, and a Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 259, were filed by the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe of the Lake Traverse Indian Reservation, North Dakota and South Dakota; the Spirit Lake…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
Interstate Power Co. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
Tyus v. SchoemehlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
Black Clawson Company, Inc. v. Kroenert Corporation, Klaus Dieter Reinhardt, and Maschinenfabrik Max Kroenert Gmbh and Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
Maurice Hardie and Randy Johnson v. Cotter and Company, Maurice Hardie and Randy Johnson v. Cotter and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Zebrowski v. American Standard Insurance Company of WisconsinDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017