Legal Opinion

In re Hicks

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2016No. Docket No. 328870PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, P.J.

Respondent-mother is a cognitively impaired young woman. When respondent’s family support system fell apart, she relinquished custody of her two-month-old daughter to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Subsequently, the DHHS took respondent’s newborn son into care. Although the child-protective proceedings persisted for more than three years and the DHHS was well aware of respondent’s special needs, the case service plan never included reasonable accommodations to provide respondent a meaningful opportunity to benefit. Absent such accommodations, the DHHS failed in its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Buck v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. In Re MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re FreyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re Elijah C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. in Re Brc MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. in Re C Applewhiate Jr MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. in Re Hambrick MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. in Re Hillsburg MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API