In re Hicks
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, P.J.
Respondent-mother is a cognitively impaired young woman. When respondent’s family support system fell apart, she relinquished custody of her two-month-old daughter to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Subsequently, the DHHS took respondent’s newborn son into care. Although the child-protective proceedings persisted for more than three years and the DHHS was well aware of respondent’s special needs, the case service plan never included reasonable accommodations to provide respondent a meaningful opportunity to benefit. Absent such accommodations, the DHHS failed in its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Buck v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- In re FreyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Elijah C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- in Re Brc MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- in Re C Applewhiate Jr MinorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- in Re Hambrick MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- in Re Hillsburg MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.