Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Concurrence
COCHRAN, J.,
delivered a concurring opinion.
This case demonstrates the wisdom of a rule that all immunity agreements must be in writing, signed by the defendant, his counsel, the prosecutor, and the trial judge. Indeed, the Legislature might consider enacting a statute outlining the procedures regulating the grant of transactional or use immunity. That said, I concur with the result reached by the majority in this particular instance, although I disagree with some of the reasoning. I conclude that, under these special circumstances, a defendant should not be made to suffer the disastrous…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.