Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 2002No. 1862-98Published

1Concurrence

COCHRAN, J.,

delivered a concurring opinion.

This case demonstrates the wisdom of a rule that all immunity agreements must be in writing, signed by the defendant, his counsel, the prosecutor, and the trial judge. Indeed, the Legislature might consider enacting a statute outlining the procedures regulating the grant of transactional or use immunity. That said, I concur with the result reached by the majority in this particular instance, although I disagree with some of the reasoning. I conclude that, under these special circumstances, a defendant should not be made to suffer the disastrous…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API