Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Pima County
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 17, 1976No. CIV 76-144-TUC-WCFPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREY, District Judge.
ORDER
This class action was brought pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Sections 1981 and 1983, and jurisdiction was invoked pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Sections 2201, 2202 and 1343.
Plaintiff Gomez, a Deputy Sheriff, in his First Amended Complaint, alleged that defendants Pima County, Sheriff William Cox, and other individual defendants have subjected him to several disciplinary actions and have denied and are denying him promotional opportunities in violation of his rights under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- James G. CARIDDI, Appellant, v. KANSAS CITY CHIEFS FOOTBALL CLUB, INC., and Robert M. Wachter, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Garcia v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Alonzo v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Barrella v. Village of FreeportDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Patel v. Holley House MotelsDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.