Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Douglas Tannehill
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1995No. 93-1709PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
As the last of seven defendants in the early 1980s savings and loan “1-30 scandal” in Texas, Paul Douglas Tannehill appeals his convictions for conspiracy and overvaluation of land, with the critical issue being whether his statutory or constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violated; especially, whether, if only argument, and not testimony or other evidence, is presented on a pretrial motion not heard until after trial begins, the period between filing and argument is excludable under § 3161(h)(1)(F) of the Speedy Trial Act (excludes “[a]ny period…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur FormannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Craig ClaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- United States v. StaulaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. AvantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Anthony Kariuki v. Tracy TarangoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.