Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Weinstein

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 7, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Millard L. Midonick, J.

A guardian of the property of an infant has requested permission of this court to withdraw the infant’s funds from a six-year time certificate and to purchase two six-month certificates of $10,000 each. Admittedly, the withdrawal will result in a penalty charge. The guardian, however argues that the transfer “will ultimately be of great benefit to [the infant] as the annual interest earned will be approximately twice that which it is currently earning.” The following discussion does not take into account the drastic downward changes for the interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warren v. . Union Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Delafield v. BarretNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of StumppNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. Schwartz v. KutsherNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In re Darlene C.New York Surrogate's Court · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HaberstichNew York Surrogate's Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API