Legal Opinion
Leonhardt v. Holden Business Forms Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 11, 1993No. 3-93 CIV 304PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Senior District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on June 3, 1993, on the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, the plaintiffs’ motion for expedited discovery, and the third-party plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiffs ask this Court to preliminarily enjoin defendant Holden Business Forms Group Health Plan (the “Plan”) from continuing to deny coverage for autologous bone marrow transplant (“ABMT”) treatment for Penelope Leonhardt’s multiple myeloma. The third-party plaintiff, Holden Business Forms Company (“Holden”), asks that, if this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Drexel Finley and Grace Finley v. Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- TMJ Implants, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2002
- Anderson v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Garcia v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Pitman v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.