Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Spatuzza and James Cozzo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 21, 1964No. 14291_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

Defendants, Joseph Spatuzza and James Cozzo, were indicted with Richard Bravieri and Anthony La Pore for possession of stolen goods in violation of section 659 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. § 659. Bravieri pleaded guilty; the other three defendants were tried by a jury and found guilty. Spatuzza and Cozzo appeal from the judgments sentencing them to terms of imprisonment. La Pore did not appeal.

In December, 1962, a van loaded with cosmetics was transported piggy-back by the New York Central Railroad from New Jersey to Chicago. Following arrival in the New York Central…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. John D. GrecoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Adell C. Carter, Alias Ponto, and Ronnie Mae Mathis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. Kevin Harrison, United States of America v. Isaac Pendergrast, United States of America v. Juan GordonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Yvonne Harris and Josephine HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Kugzruk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API