Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical Center
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
California's statutory peer review process, Business and Professions Code section 809 et seq., provides a physician with the right to a hearing for the purpose of reviewing a hospital peer review committee’s recommendation to deny the physician’s application for reappointment to staff privileges. A hearing officer may be appointed to preside at the hearing, but the officer is prohibited by statute from acting as a prosecutor or advocate or from voting on the merits. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 809.2, subd. (b).)1 The merits are determined by the trier of fact, often a panel drawn…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Kibler v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Miller v. Eisenhower Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Alexander v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Fahlen v. Sutter Central Valley HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- El-Attar v. Hollywood Presbyterian Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Nesson v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Shahinian v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.