Legal Opinion

E & M Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 25, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, dated August 28, 1992, which denied administrative review of an order of the District Rent Administrator dated February 28, 1991, finding, inter alia, a rent overcharge, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated March 21, 1994, as dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Vita v. HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Jonathan Woodner Co. v. HigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Stone v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. H.C. Black Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Futterman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Panama Leasing Co. v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API