Legal Opinion

Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s finding of a willful rent overcharge was dismissed on the ground that petitioner did not file a petition for administrative review within 35 days after issuance of respondent’s order (9 NYCRR 2529.2), and therefore failed to exhaust its administrative *445remedies. The IAS court rejected petitioner’s denial of receipt of respondent’s order, finding that respondent presented sufficient proof that the order was mailed in the regular course of business. Proof that a regular office practice and procedure is followed with respect to mailings raises a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Kaplen v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dowling v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Stone v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Nelson Management Group, Ltd. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. E & M Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. H.C. Black Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API