Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Higgins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
This article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s finding of a willful rent overcharge was dismissed on the ground that petitioner did not file a petition for administrative review within 35 days after issuance of respondent’s order (9 NYCRR 2529.2), and therefore failed to exhaust its administrative *445remedies. The IAS court rejected petitioner’s denial of receipt of respondent’s order, finding that respondent presented sufficient proof that the order was mailed in the regular course of business. Proof that a regular office practice and procedure is followed with respect to mailings raises a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nassau Insurance v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kaplen v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dowling v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Stone v. GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Nelson Management Group, Ltd. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- E & M Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- H.C. Black Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.