Legal Opinion

City of Bloomington v. Chuckney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1975No. 1-1074A165PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, C.J.

The defendant-appellant (City) brings this appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs-appellees (Chuckney) holding certain sections of a City ordinance void.

The issue upon appeal is whether the City, as a municipal corporation under Indiana law, had the power to enact the ordinance.

For the reasons expressed herein, we are of the opinion that the trial court was correct in its ruling that sections of the ordinance were ultra vires.

The Bloomington Common Council drafted and passed Ordinance 72-76, entitled, “An Act to Improve the Quality of Housing in the City of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Dunn, Auditor v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCrory Corp. v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Crull v. PlattIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Miller v. GeelsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. City of Atlanta v. McKinneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Costanzi v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API