Legal Opinion

Edmunds v. Edmunds

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 2008No. COA08-246Published

1Opinion of the Court

669 S.E.2d 874 (2008)

Donald P. EDMUNDS, Plaintiff

v.

Phyllis M. EDMUNDS, Defendant.

No. COA08-246.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

December 16, 2008.

The McGougan Law Firm, by Paul J. Ekster and Dennis T. Worley, Tabor City, for plaintiff-appellee.

Williamson, Walton & Scott, L.L.P., by Benton H. Walton, III, C. Martin Scott, II, Whiteville, and Thomas L. Odom, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant.

CALABRIA, Judge.

This appeal arises from an order denying a motion for relief under Rules 54, 55, 58, and 60 of our Rules of Civil Procedure filed by Phyllis M. Edmunds ("defendant") and Elizabeth E.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Coppedge v. CoppedgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Godwin v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API