Legal Opinion

Karner v. Roy White Flowers, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 2000No. 475A99PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAINWRIGHT, Justice.

Plaintiffs and defendants own lots in Elizabeth Heights, a subdivision in Charlotte, North Carolina. Elizabeth Heights was developed as a residential subdivision at the turn of the century. When the developer began conveying lots in 1907, each deed included a covenant restricting the use of each parcel to residential use only.

In September 1995, defendants applied for demolition permits for the residential structures on three of their lots. Subsequently, a local newspaper reported that Roy White Flowers had applied for demolition permits for structures on the three lots and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Sheets v. . DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Sheets v. DillonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Page v. Bald Head Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Lee v. Puamana Community Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Midsouth Golf, LLC v. Fairfield Harbourside Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API