Rubin v. W. H. Hinman, Inc.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WEBBER, Justice.
On report. This was an action for trespass brought by plaintiff property owner against defendant road contractor. The defendant entered upon plaintiff’s property without permission, dug a trench and laid a pipe therein. The parties .recognize that defendant is justified if and only if the State Highway Commission had lawfully taken a drainage easement over the plaintiff’s property for highway purposes. Each party seasonably filed motion for summary judgment, there being no dispute as to material facts. Report was by agreement ordered upon the complaint, answer, plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Fishel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
- Paine v. SavageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Hayford v. Municipal OfficersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- In Re Bangor Hydro-Electric CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974