Legal Opinion

Rubin v. W. H. Hinman, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 28, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

On report. This was an action for trespass brought by plaintiff property owner against defendant road contractor. The defendant entered upon plaintiff’s property without permission, dug a trench and laid a pipe therein. The parties .recognize that defendant is justified if and only if the State Highway Commission had lawfully taken a drainage easement over the plaintiff’s property for highway purposes. Each party seasonably filed motion for summary judgment, there being no dispute as to material facts. Report was by agreement ordered upon the complaint, answer, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
  3. Fishel v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Paine v. SavageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. Hayford v. Municipal OfficersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Finks v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. In Re Bangor Hydro-Electric CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API