Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Marquardt & Sons

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1898No. 2,554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant, as assignee of George C. Freeman, sued the appellees, Ewing Stilwell, sheriff of Jackson county, and G. W. Marquardt & Sons, a corporation of Chicago, Illinois, for the recovery of possession of a certain stock of goods and damages for the detention thereof. There was an answer in denial, and a trial by the court resulted in a finding for the appellees, in accordance with which judgment was rendered.

The overruling of the appellant’s motion for a new trial is assigned as error, and it is contended that the finding was not supported by sufficient evidence. The complaint showed,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Rail Road v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Weider v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Barnett v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Woolson v. PipherIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MurdockUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gray v. CovertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Schoenwald v. McDonaldDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API