Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Bernstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

Appellant was a marshal of the city of New York during the period involved, claimant an employee in his office engaged in the work thereof. It has been determined that the marshal was the employer of the claimant within the purview of the Unemployment Insurance Law, and that claimant, who was discharged, is entitled to unemployment benefits.

The duties of a marshal are connected generally with the Municipal Court of the City of New York, and are defined by section 151 of the Municipal Court Code which in part is as follows: ‘ ‘ Except as otherwise prescribed in this act or in the rules, every…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Perry (Western Receivers Assn.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. In Re the Claim of PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Unified Court SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Mersereau v. McGuireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. In re BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. In re Unified Court SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API