Legal Opinion

Blosick v. Warmbold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1922No. 22,691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in the district court for Stearns county to recover $3,000 paid on the purchase price of land. The case was tried before lloeser, J., who at the close of the testimony denied defendants’ motions for a directed verdict and for a dismissal of the action, and a jury which returned a verdict for $2,820. From an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action to recover the consideration paid upon a contract for the sale of real property, upon rescission by the act Of the grantee therein. Plaintiff had a verdict and from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendants appeal.

Defendant August Warmbold owned a farm of 135 acres in Stearns county, upon which there were about 90 acres of cultivated land and some ordinary farm buildings. On April 16, 1920, plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendants for the purchase of the farm at the agreed price of $140 per acre, payable as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. In re Official Ballot for the General Election of November, 1906Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. Neibuhr v. GageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Ballard v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Liebsch v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. West v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Doerr v. ClaysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API